| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Meio Norte / UEP-Parnaíba. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/11/1993 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/10/2016 |
|
Autoria: |
BOS, M. G.; NUGTEREN, J. |
|
Título: |
On irrigation efficiencies. |
|
Edição: |
4th ed. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1990 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Wageningen: ILRI, 1990. |
|
Páginas: |
117 p. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Série: |
(ILRI. Publication, 19). |
|
ISBN: |
90-70260-875 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Definition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations. MenosDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Efficiency; Eficiencia; Resultados; Results; Use; Uso. |
|
Thesagro: |
Irrigação. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
irrigation. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02281nam a2200265 a 4500
001 1240607
005 2016-10-13
008 1990 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
020 $a90-70260-875
100 1 $aBOS, M. G.
245 $aOn irrigation efficiencies.
250 $a4th ed.
260 $aWageningen: ILRI$c1990
300 $a117 p.$cil.
490 $a(ILRI. Publication, 19).
520 $aDefinition of the problem; Method of investigation applied; Data processing: Grouping of areas; definitions of efficiencies; Calculating theefficiencies; Efficiency terminology and reuse; Accuracy of the calculated efficiencies. Some results not directly related to irrigation efficiency: Field irrigation method versus irrigated area; Farm size distribution; Number of farms served by group inlets; Project staffing. Analysis and evaluation of the data from the questionaire with respect to irrigation efficiency: Conveyance efficiency; Conveyance efficiency versus average irrigable area; Conveyance efficiency versus size of rotational unit; Conveyance efficiency as a function of technical equipment; Distribution efficiency; Distribution efficiency versus farm sizeand soil type; Distribution efficiency versus duration of delivery period; Farm inlet versus group inlet; Field application efficiency; Influence of field irrigation method on field application efficiency; Effect of depth of application on e (a); Field application efficiency versus farm size and soil type; Influence of farm flow rate on applicationefficiency; Tertiary unit efficiency; Influence of flow rate at farm inlet on tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of water charges to tertiary unit efficiency; Relation of tertiary unit efficiency to method of water supply to the farm; Irrigation system efficiency; Relation of irrigation system efficiency to actually irrigated area; Influence of project management on irrigation system efficiency; Everall or project efficiency. Practical application of the study results with some examples. Evaluation of the applied approach. Conclusions and recommendations.
650 $airrigation
650 $aIrrigação
653 $aEfficiency
653 $aEficiencia
653 $aResultados
653 $aResults
653 $aUse
653 $aUso
700 1 $aNUGTEREN, J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste (CPAO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
| 3. |  | MONTEIRO, A. N. T. R.; BERTOL, T. M.; OLIVEIRA, P. A. V. de; DOURMAD, J. Y.; COLDEBELLA, A.; KESSLER, A. M. The impact of feeding growing-finishing pigs with reduced dietary protein levels on performance, carcass traits, meat quality and environmental impacts. Livestock Science, v. 198, p. 162-169, 2017.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|    |
| 5. | | MONTEIRO, A. N. T. R.; OLIVEIRA, P. A. V. de; BERTOL, T. M.; KESSLER, A. de M.; COLDEBELLA, A.; DOURMAD, J-Y. Influence de la réduction de lapport en nutriments sur les performances et les impacts environnementaux de lengraissement des porcs au Brésil. Journées de la Recherche Porcine en France, Paris, v. 50, p. 25-30, 2018.| Tipo: Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|  |
| 6. | | EORY, V.; MACLEOD, M.; FAVERDIN, P.; O´BRIEN, D.; SILVA, R. de O.; BARIONI, L. G.; ALBERTINI, Z.; TOPP, K.; FERNANDES, F. A.; MORAN, D.; HUTCHINGS, N.; STIENEZEN, M.; SHALOO, L.; REES, R. M.; MOGENSEN, L.; LUND, P.; BRASK, M.; DOREAU, M.; GARCIA-LAUNAY, F.; DOURMAD, J. Y.; BENDAHAN, A. B.; VELOSO, R. F.; GONZALEZ, R. D. S. Report on developing bottom-up Marginal Abatement Cost Curves (MACCS) for representative farm types. [S. l.: s. n.], 2015. 129 p.| Tipo: Autoria/Organização/Edição de Livros |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Roraima. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
